RP-15.1 Rail

RP-15.1 Rail

RP-15.1

These specifications permit the modeling of several different prototype rail sections in the various scales with a minimum number of model rail sections.

Nominal dimensions only are shown. These dimensions should be adhered to as closely as manufacturing techniques permit in order to facilitate matching rails of different manufacturers and to provide common dimensions for the installation of Rail Joiners.

No dimension is shown for web thickness of the rail. Particularly in the smaller sizes it must be a compromise between scale reduction from the prototype and a thickness that will provide mechanical strength and sufficient cross section area to carry electrical propulsion current without excessive resistance.

Hard drawn rail is preferred to medium hardness, and soft drawn or annealed rail is not recommended.

Selection of rail sections that provide 'natural flangeways' resulting from B - C dimensions corresponding to the requirements of STANDARD S-3 may expedite assembling guard rails and wing rails without fitting or spacing these rails from their stock or frog rails.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

TABLE 1
CODE A B C D F H R
297 .297 .250 .125 .050 .083 .062 .016
250 .250 .224 .112 .044 .073 .055 .014
208 .208 .188 .094 .038 .063 .047 .012
172 .172 .156 .078 .031 .052 .039 .010
148 .148 .132 .066 .026 .044 .033 .009
125 .125 .125 .063 .021 .035 .028 .007
100 .100 .090 .045 .018 .030 .023 .006
83 .083 .080 .040 .016 .027 .020 .005
70 .070 .070 .035 .014 .023 .017 .004
55 .055 .055 .028 .011 .018 .014 .004
40 .040 .040 .020 .008 .013 .010 .003
32 .032 .032 .016 .006 .011 .008 .003

NOTE: Special rail sections incorporating projections beyond the regular section, such as Girder Rail (self-flanging) should conform in all pertinent respects to this specification. departing from it only where necessary to their special function.

 


Transcriber's Note: the following two tables have become separated from this RP over the last few years and were just located. They have been restored pending verification that they are still intended to be a part of RP-15.1 (3/18/00)


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

TABLE 2
PROTOTYPE EQUIVALENT SCALE RAIL HEIGHT
    Scale 1/2" #1 0 S 00 HO TT N Z
    Ratio 24 32 48 64 76.2 87.1 120 160 220
  *
Std Weight Height
PRR 155 8.000 .333 .250 .167 .125 .105 .092 .067 .050 .036
AREA 140 7.312 .305 .229 .152 .114 .096 .084 .061 .046 .033
AREA 132 7.125 .297 .223 .148 .111 .094 .082 .059 .045 .032
AREA 115 6.625 .276 .207 .138 .104 .087 .076 .055 .041 .030
AREA 100 6.000 .250 .188 .125 .094 .079 .069 .050 .038 .027
AREA 90 5.625 .234 .176 .117 .088 .074 .065 .047 .035 .026
ASCE 85 5.188 .216 .162 .108 .081 .068 .060 .043 .032 .024
ASCE 80 5.000 .208 .156 .104 .078 .066 .057 .042 .031 .023
ASCE 75 4.812 .201 .150 .100 .075 .063 .055 .040 .030 .022
ASCE 70 4.625 .193 .145 .096 .072 .061 .053 .039 .029 .021
ASCE 65 4.438 .185 .139 .092 .069 .058 .051 .037 .028 .020
ASCE 60 4.250 .177 .133 .089 .066 .056 .049 .035 .027 .019
ASCE 55 4.062 .169 .127 .085 .063 .053 .047 .034 .025 .018
ASCE 50 3.875 .161 .121 .081 .061 .051 .044 .032 .024 .018
ASCE 45 3.688 .154 .115 .077 .058 .048 .042 .031 .023 .017
ASCE 40 3.500 .146 .109 .073 .055 .046 .040 .029 .022 .016
ASCE 35 3.312 .138 .104 .069 .052 .043 .038 .028 .021 .015
ASCE 30 3.125 .130 .098 .065 .049 .041 .036 .026 .020 .014
ASCE 25 2.750 .115 .086 .057 .043 .036 .032 .023 .017 .013

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

*The weight of prototype Rail is expressed in pounds per yard in the United States.

To model equivalent scale height Rail in the various scales, select from Table 1 the available Rail nearest in height to the equivalent shown in Table 2 above.

Between 1938 and 1963 the reports of the Interstate Commerce Commission listed the distribution of the weight of rail used on the Class 1 railroads of the United States. The abstract below shows the increasing average rail weight between 1940 and 1960. It should be noted that short lines, narrow gage lines and traction lines used lighter rails.

TABLE 3
Weight 1940 1946 1950 1958 1960
< 70 9.54 7.23 6.68 5.28 4.91
70 - 79 10.12 8.64 7.81 6.63 6.55
80 - 89 6.63 14.08 12.88 10.99 10.85
90 - 99 32.10 18.86 16.79 14.74 14.61
100 - 109 18.69 16.94 15.35 13.37 13.58
110 - 119 11.24 17.04 20.07 23.83 23.84
120 - 129 1.91 3.03 2.09 3.17 2.98
130 - 139 9.57 13.71 16.51 20.09 20.63
> 139 0.20 0.46 1.01 1.90 2.05